Who typically bears the burden of proof for asserting rights to a property based on a deed?

In property law, the burden of proof for asserting rights to a property based on a deed typically falls on the grantee. This is because the grantee is the party receiving the rights or interests in the property, and they must demonstrate their ownership and the validity of the deed in order to enforce their rights against third parties or even against the grantor.

When a deed is executed, it conveys interest from the grantor to the grantee. Therefore, if there is any dispute regarding the rights associated with that property, it is the grantee's responsibility to prove that the deed was effectively created, delivered, accepted, and that it contains the requisite language to convey those rights. This includes demonstrating that the deed is genuine, that all legal requirements were met, and that the grantee is indeed entitled to the rights described in the deed.

The other options do not typically bear the burden of proof in this context. The grantor would generally not need to prove anything unless contesting the validity of the conveyance. The state government generally does not have a role in individual property disputes unless enforcing specific regulations or laws. Property managers act on behalf of the property owner, and their role is not to assert rights based on a deed but rather to manage the