What type of defect is likely to impose greater liability on the seller?

Choosing personal residence and dangerous defects is the right answer because such defects typically involve significant risks to health and safety, thereby imposing a higher level of liability on the seller. Dangerous defects, such as structural problems, mold, or safety hazards, can create serious issues for buyers, which are often not just minor inconveniences but rather pose risks of injury or even loss of life.

In real estate transactions, sellers generally have a duty to disclose material defects that could affect the safety or desirability of a property. When these defects are linked to personal safety or health, the potential liability rises considerably. Courts are inclined to hold sellers accountable for failing to disclose such defects because they violate a fundamental duty to inform potential buyers of any risks that could affect their decision.

For example, if a seller is aware of significant plumbing problems that could lead to serious water damage, failing to disclose this flaw could result in increased liability, particularly if it subsequently causes injury or extensive damage to the buyer's property. Dangerous conditions necessitate higher scrutiny because they directly impact the buyer's ability to safely occupy and enjoy the property.

In contrast, minor cosmetic issues, previously repaired items, and common wear and tear are generally viewed as less severe. While these issues can be relevant in a transaction,