What are the criteria for setting aside a compliant deed under fraudulent conveyances?

The correct criteria for setting aside a compliant deed under fraudulent conveyances include the intent to hinder creditors and the fact that the grantor did not receive equivalent value in the exchange.

In fraudulent conveyance law, a transfer can be set aside if it can be demonstrated that the grantor intended to defraud or hinder existing or future creditors. This means that if the purpose of the transaction was to avoid creditors or to shield assets from them, it can be considered fraudulent. Additionally, if the transfer did not involve the grantor receiving equivalent value in return—meaning they gave away an asset worth more than what they received in return—the conveyance can be challenged. The combination of these two elements establishes a solid basis for invalidating the transfer.

Other options address valid concepts but do not fully capture the core criteria necessary for fraudulent conveyances. For instance, while factors regarding exchanged value (or the lack of it) and the financial status of the grantor may be relevant in different contexts, none encompass the requirements set out in option A as fully or accurately. Therefore, focusing on both the intent to hinder creditors and the lack of equivalent value makes option A the most appropriate choice.