In a deed, if there is no ID of the parties, what is presumed?

When a deed is presented without the identification of the parties, it is generally presumed that the person taking delivery is authorized to fill in that identifying information. This reflects the principle that the execution of a deed is intended to effectuate the parties' intent, and ensuring that the deed is valid and capable of being recorded is a priority in property law.

This authority to fill in information in the deed is often recognized in practice to facilitate transactions and avoid unnecessary barriers to transfer. The rationale rests on the understanding that the parties involved have already agreed upon the transfer, and the omission of specific details regarding their identities does not necessarily undermine that intent. As long as there is clarity on the parties’ original intent and recognition of the intent to convey property rights, the deed can still be effective once those details are properly completed.

In contrast, the other options present assertions that overlook the flexibility allowed in deed execution or misinterpret how deeds operate. A deed not identifying the parties may still be valid as long as the necessary elements for a valid deed are met, including the intent to convey and proper execution. Therefore, permitting the authorized person to fill in the missing identifiers ensures that the overall purpose of the deed is upheld.